Paul Ryan is an Idiot

Paul Ryan is the Republican's "best and brightest" budgetary thinker. However, his last few budget proposals have a number of errors in thinking that show that he is, apparently, an abject idiot -- or, if we use the definition of 'doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result,' insane. You be the judge as to which applies.

Mr. Ryan just released his latest budget proposal and it, too, has a number of flaws. One that he consistently and egregiously makes is using an "infinite horizon" philosophy when discussing Medicare and Social Security without also applying the philosophy to the rest of the budget. He used it throughout the election cycle, even after, literally, dozens of economists and politicos pointed out this mistake. He also doesn't seem to understand how Social Security actual works (or that it is funded well into the future) or that rising medical costs are the reasons why Medicare is floundering.

I finally found an article that summed up all of the mistakes. It points out his many factual errors, some of which I mention above. I also stopped researching "entitlement" program errors when I found that the same author conveniently summed up all of those errors that Mr. Ryan, and Republican leadership in general, keep promoting to the general population.

(Aside: The word "entitlement" has two meanings, and the Republican leadership always takes the wrong one when discussing these programs. The actual meaning of entitlement for these programs is: You paid into SS and Medicare and, when you reach the appropriate age or retire, you are entitled to the benefits/money you paid for. Why can't Mr. Ryan figure that out?)

Another LA Times article also managed to sum up something about Mr. Ryan's philosophy, and Republican leadership in general, that I simply don't understand:

As the GOP's top budget thinker and its 2012 vice presidential nominee, Ryan acknowledged that he and Mitt Romney lost the election after running on these principles.

But Republicans believe Americans are ready for the GOP's tough-love approach to reining in deficits.

"The election didn't go our way. Believe me, I know what that feels like," said Ryan, surrounded by more than a dozen Republican colleagues. "That means we surrender our principles? That means we stop believing in what we believe in?"

While the vote doesn't explicitly state that Republicans should surrender their principles, it does indicate, as do the plethora of polls since the election concerning the fiscal situation, that the American people are not buying into and do not want what Republican leadership is selling. They want a balanced approach that includes stimulating the economy, cuts, closing of taxation loopholes, and tax increases on the wealthy. Since we live in a Democratic Republic, that means our elected officials are supposed to listen to the public they were elected to serve and do what the majority has requested. Instead, the Republican leadership keeps proposing the same things they have that a) got us into this mess and b) ignores what the majority is requesting. They keep fighting when Independents, Democrats, and even some of the more moderate Republicans bring this up or make proposals that are in line with the majority opinion.

As has been repeatedly pointed out, the budget cannot be balanced on cuts and closing loopholes alone. The numbers are simply too big. Taxation and stimulus is absolutely necessary, yet Republican leadership refuses to commit to those and fights them every step of the way. If Mr. Ryan is, in fact, the Republican party's best and brightest budget guy, he should know this!

If I were still a registered Republican, which I was for the first fourteen years of my voting life (I am registered "Declines to State" now, or Independent), I would be appalled, disappointed, and angry over my current Congressional leadership. I would be contacting them and telling them to stop the obstructionism, stop the filibustering, and stop the idiocy. If I were one of the silent majority of more moderate Republican Congressmen, I would be quietly talking with other Republicans and seeing about a vote of no-confidence and removing John Boehner and others from their leadership positions and getting people who want to work toward solutions in there (I also think the more moderate Democrats should be doing the same and getting rid of Nancy Pelosi, who is nearly as bad).

Why can't Republican leadership acknowledge what the American people want, work with Democratic leadership to come up with a compromise that gets spending cuts in many areas they want, closure of tax loopholes they originally proposed and Mr. Obama has agreed with, AND allows for stimulus and tax increases in areas that, while they may not like, are willing to stomach? Compromise is what the American system of government is founded on, but we have seen little of that for at least 12 years now. First it was the Republicans having both the Presidency and the House refusing to compromise and steam-rolling over the Democrats, then it was the Democrats having the House and then the Presidency and steamrolling over the Republicans, and now it is the Democrats having the Presidency (and Senate), and the Republicans having the House and no one can get anything done.

It is time for a revolution. We need to vote these people out of office, insist on changes to the rules of Congress, and we absolutely must have term limits!

#revolution

Addendum: Just saw this and thought it summed up what I was writing here very simply.